Aberdeen's City Centre

I’ve tried to be positive about the City Square/Gardens project, but it’s actually so deeply flawed that it’s difficult to pick the weakest aspect.

 

They know there’s a plan for “some

kind of performance and exhibition space”, but rather than identifying a need for the city, and trying to find a way to fund it, instead, they’ve decided there should be a space, and now “Locum Consultants – part of the Collier International group – have been hired to find uses for it.”

 

The whole project has been done backwards – with an idea, and city officials, ACSEF et al frantically scrabbling around to find any justification for it.

 

We’re building it because it will be great for the city – how?  Well, it’ll have things in it, and do stuff.

 

At an event recently a City Council official told me two telling things.

 

1.     “That a business case should be ready by the end of the year.” 

 

This isn’t how the loan will be repaid by the increase in business rates.  “Nothing is entirely risk free”, rather this is what the money being sent will actually bring to the city.

There was a £13m plan, which I quite liked, to build an arts centre into the slopes at the garden, it would have rejuvenated the garden, and would have brought around £3m a year into the local economy.  So net gain to the economy after 4 years. (Faster considering that much of the funding came from outside of the area)  This plan will cost £140m – with at least £70m coming from the city council*. And the net gain to the economy each year – no-one’s got round to working that out yet.

 

 

2.     “We can’t be seen to be unable to generate the same amount as has been offered by a private funder”

 

So, the whole thing is that they don’t want to be seen to turn down (up to) £50m towards a project budgeted at 3 times that.  It’s not about the strength of the project, or that this is the best idea, it’s simply that they can’t be seen to be turning down an offer.  I’m not sure they realise that all of this offer will be used up in funding the project, they don’t get to spend the money on anything else.  (And that’s assuming it’s on budget)

*yes, I know that the loan will be repaid by the increase in business rates – based on the assumption that the increase will cover it – but at best, this increased income is being used to pay for something – it’s not as if the council will be able to spend this on anything but paying back the loan (I’m not sure they understand this)

Posted via email from mikemuses's posterous

Do you buy a lottery ticket to help charity?

National lottery and now the new Health lottery both play on their ‘charitable’ angle, but that’s a minor part of their business.

 

As Kevin says in his blog post; 

 

28p of every £ National Lottery ticket goes to a good cause, and it’s raised millions for good causes over the years.

20p of every Health Lottery ticket will go to charities too.  And it may well raise plenty for good causes too.

 

But £1.25 of every £1 you give to a charity goes to the good cause.

 

So for every £ you ‘give’ through the national lottery, you effectively ‘lose’ 97p of value to the charity.

 

The lotteries have been a great source of income for charities, but that’s incidental to making a few people very rich.  (Winners and Camelot directors)

  

Play the lottery if you want (I do from time to time), but do it to win the jackpot. If you want to help a charity, just give them the money yourself.

 

Posted via email from mikemuses's posterous